A crew of agents that drafts, checks and files, and never sends on its own.

We run our own company on one: an assistant you talk to, a crew in departments behind it, routing that matches each job to the cost of getting it wrong, and a department review before anything leaves. We build the same shape around your back office.

Built
MUVES OS, our own operating system
Scale
34 agents in 9 departments
Models
Small local models, Codex, two tiers of Claude
Claude
Tests
62 automated checks in the main suite
Status
In daily use since 2026

One assistant at the front, departments behind it.

Each department has a head that routes and reviews, and crew members that do one narrow job well. This is our real structure. One personal department is left off the picture.

You The assistant you talk toAnswers small talk itself, sends the rest on, by text or voice IntakeFixed rules first, a model second. Writes down the reason Build6 agentsDesigns, builds,reviews, tests Research4 agentsGathers, concludes,tries to refute Comms4 agentsSorts the inbox,drafts never send Clients4 agentsTracks the pipeline,never closes Finance3 agentsRecords money,never moves it Design3 agentsCritiques like anannoyed customer Marketing3 agentsSite, copyand search Department head reviewOutward work is held until its head has checked it. The result becomes that agent's memory A person sends
How MUVES OS fits together. The 34 includes the assistant, intake and a five-agent personal department not shown here.

Route on the cost of being wrong.

Not on the department label. A cheap mistake runs on a free model; an expensive one gets the best model and a reviewer.

Four mail chutes of growing size: a small note drops into the smallest, a sealed letter into the largest under a magnifying glass
TierGetsWhy this tier
Small local modelsRouting, sorting, pulling out fields, first draftsFree and fast on short inputs. Measured: 12 of 12 routing tests right, about 1 second each, once "thinking" mode was off
CodexCode and analysis that no client readsReal reasoning on a separate allowance, so work keeps moving when Claude is low or down
Smaller ClaudeTriage that needs judgement, structured updatesJudgement and light synthesis without the top model
Best ClaudeDecisions, reviews, anything a client readsKept for work where being wrong is expensive

Jobs over 6,000 characters move up a tier automatically, and every routing choice is logged with its reason, including which engines were up and what the recent results looked like.

Every job starts human-led and earns its way up.

Five of our real workflows and the rung each sits on today. Moving up is a decision someone makes, not a setting that drifts.

Workflow
Human-led
Human-assisted
Autonomous
Sort the inbox before you open it
You read everything
It sorts and summarises; you open only what matters
Drafts routine replies, held for one tap
Log money the moment it is spent
You type it into the sheet
You say it out loud; it logs; you glance at the row
Logs alone, flags what it can't categorise
Answer a question that needs sources
You search and read
It gathers and concludes, with sources; you decide
Standing research, reports only changes
Follow up a client who went quiet
You notice and write it
It notices and drafts; you edit and send
Never. Every word to a client is a person's
Build and ship a code change
You drive every step
Architect proposes, you approve, reviewer checks
Not while it can reach a client's system

A back-office crew, shaped like your week.

Most businesses don't need nine departments. A service company might want four desks:

Intake

Reads every request.

Comms

Sorts the inbox and drafts replies.

Quotes

Drafts from your price list for you to approve.

Books

Captures expenses from a sentence.

We map your workflows first, put each one on the ladder at human-led, and add the crew in the order that removes the most steps. Personal spaces stay private, even from the owner account, and anything shaped like a password is stripped from logs before it is stored.

You'd need: a list of the jobs that eat your week, access to the inbox and tools involved, and someone who decides when a job moves up a rung.

About running a crew.

A desktop PC tower with a glowing graphics card under a desk, linked by a dotted line to a small cloud above
Why many small agents instead of one big assistant?

Because each job has a different cost of being wrong. Sorting an inbox can run on a small, free model. A reply to a client needs the strongest model and a reviewer. Splitting the work lets each part use the right model and the right check.

Does it need expensive hardware?

Ours runs its small models on one desktop PC with a mid-range graphics card, and sends harder work to cloud models. Yours could run entirely in the cloud if keeping data in the office is not a requirement.

Can agents send emails or move money on their own?

Not in anything we build by default. Outward messages wait for review and a person's send. Finance agents record money and never move it. Any step up in autonomy is a decision you make, per job, in writing.

Which jobs fill your week? Let's put them on the ladder.

On a free call we list your repeat work and mark which rung each job could start on.